Research hubAdvisory economics
An independent advisory firm lives on a small number of large, one-off fees, and the succession wave is smaller and lumpier than the headlines.
Published 1 November 2026Evidence to 1 November 202636 sources5 charts
Summary
An independent advisory firm lives on a small number of large, one-off fees. Survey data put the success fee at 4.8% of a $5 million deal, falling to 1.9% of a $150 million deal. At listed independents, pay takes 64% to 72% of revenue, and it does not fall as fast as revenue in a bad year. Filings from four UK boutiques show the same business at a smaller scale, with partners taking most of what remains. Owner retirement is a real and lasting source of mandates, but the figures most often quoted are stated intentions. In Canada they differ by a factor of three, and the UK's one hard count fell for two years before jumping on a tax deadline. Listed firms are far larger than a boutique of ten people, so their figures show the shape of the business and are not targets for a small firm.
Key findings
2.0 to 2.3 times
Fees are about double the old rule of thumb. The most common success fee falls from 4.8% at $5 million to 1.9% at $150 million. Between $10 million and $50 million that is 2.0 to 2.3 times the classic Lehman scale (our calculation). European fees run 0.4 to 1.1 points lower than North American fees.
64% to 72%
Pay is the business. Across seven listed independents, pay took 64.3% to 71.7% of revenue and all other costs took 12.4% to 22.3% (our calculation).
83.6%
Pay does not fall as fast as revenue. Moelis revenue fell 44.5% from 2021 to 2023, and pay rose from 59.3% to 83.6% of revenue. Houlihan Lokey stayed between 62.1% and 64.3% throughout (our calculation).
35.7%
Small scale shows up in other costs. At four UK advisory LLPs, costs other than staff took 4.2% to 13.7% of turnover at the three larger firms and 35.7% at the 15-person firm (our calculation).
20.3% to 63%
The wave is real but uneven. In Canada, stated plans to leave or sell range from 20.3% to 63% over ten years. UK taxpayers claiming the business sale relief fell from 48,000 to 42,000, then reached 61,000 when a tax rise was announced.
Analysis
What do advisers actually charge?
Firmex, which sells data rooms, surveyed 456 middle-market professionals in December 2024 and January 2025, and 72% worked at firms of 20 people or fewer. The most common effective success fee was 4.8% on $5 million, 3.4% on $20 million, 2.0% on $100 million and 1.9% on $150 million. That is about $240,000, $680,000, $2.0 million and $2.85 million (our calculation).
The classic Lehman scale gives only 1.5% on $20 million. The "Double Lehman" scale gives 3.0%, much closer to what advisers report (our calculation). The choice of formula matters less than it seems: Firmex found it had very little effect on the effective fee. Location matters more. European fees ran 1.1 points below North America on small deals and 0.4 points on the largest.
Public deals sit far lower. In US public acquisitions from 1996 to 2005, bidder advisers earned a mean fee of 0.637% and a median of 0.467%.
Work fees are small but common. In the Firmex survey, 16% charged none (12% in Europe, 19% in North America), and the usual monthly fee was $5,000 to $10,000. Axial's 2026 survey of 331 advisers suggests a shift: nearly a third now charge nothing upfront. The sources differ on crediting: Firmex reports 57% deduct work fees from the success fee, while an adviser quoted by Axial cites 77%.
Chart 1
Advisers charge about double the classic Lehman scale on deals of $10 million to $50 million
Success fee, % of deal value, by deal size. Deal sizes are not evenly spaced.
Line chart of success fees by deal size. The survey fee falls from 4.8% at $5 million to 1.9% at $150 million, and sits close to the Double Lehman line and about twice the classic Lehman line between $10 million and $50 million.
- Double Lehman
- Survey fee
- Classic Lehman
Lehman lines are our calculation from the scales Firmex describes: classic is 5%, 4%, 3%, 2% and 1% on successive millions, then 1%; Double Lehman is twice that.
Source: Firmex Global M&A Fee Guide 2024-25, chart labels at p.22, survey of December 2024 and January 2025. Firmex sells data rooms.
See the data
| Double Lehman | Survey fee | Classic Lehman | |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5m | 6% | 4.8% | 3% |
| $10m | 4% | 4% | 2% |
| $20m | 3% | 3.4% | 1.5% |
| $50m | 2.4% | 2.7% | 1.2% |
| $100m | 2.2% | 2% | 1.1% |
| $150m | 2.13% | 1.9% | 1.07% |
What does a banker produce, and why does the benchmark not travel?
Listed independents are not boutiques. Perella Weinberg, the smallest US-listed firm here, has 736 people, more than 70 times a firm of ten. Evercore has about 2,570. Their clients, deal sizes and brands are different.
Revenue per person ran from $0.93 million at Houlihan Lokey to $1.79 million in Evercore's Investment Banking & Equities segment (our calculation). Per senior banker the range was $7.4 million to $19.1 million, though titles differ by firm. The gap mostly reflects fee size. Moelis earned about $4.2 million per client from 363 clients. Houlihan Lokey's Corporate Finance segment earned about $2.7 million per closed transaction. One listed European adviser earned about €0.93 million per transaction (our calculations).
Chart 2
Listed independents earn $0.9 million to $1.8 million for each person they employ
Revenue per person, US$ million, our calculation. These firms are far larger than a boutique of ten people.
Bars of revenue per person: Evercore $1.79 million, PJT $1.40 million, Lazard $1.17 million, Moelis $1.07 million, Perella Weinberg $1.02 million and Houlihan Lokey $0.93 million.
Revenue divided by people. Year is 2025, except Houlihan Lokey. Evercore uses segment net revenue and its stated segment headcount. Lazard's people are 216 managing directors plus 1,358 others. Moelis headcount is at 4 February 2026.
Source: Forms 10-K for 2025. Houlihan Lokey: year to March 2026.
See the data
| Value | |
|---|---|
| Evercore, Investment Banking & Equities | $1.79m |
| PJT Partners | $1.40m |
| Lazard, Financial Advisory | $1.17m |
| Moelis | $1.07m |
| Perella Weinberg | $1.02m |
| Houlihan Lokey, year to March 2026 | $0.93m |
Where does the money go?
Pay took 64.3% to 71.7% of revenue, other costs 12.4% to 22.3%, and operating margin was 6.4% to 20.5%. The important point is timing. Pay is variable, but not fully. In 2023 the pay ratio hit 83.6% at Moelis and 77.4% at Lazard, and 93.9% at Perella Weinberg, whose figure includes equity awards. Houlihan Lokey's revenue fell 20.3% in one year with little change in its ratio. PJT's revenue rose every year from 2021 to 2025. The filings do not prove why these firms held up better, but both earn fees from more than classic M&A.
Chart 3
Pay is sticky: when revenue fell, the pay ratio jumped at Moelis and barely moved at Houlihan Lokey
Compensation as % of revenue, our calculation
Line chart of pay as a share of revenue, 2021 to 2025. Moelis rose from 59.3% to 83.6% in 2023 and fell to 67.1% in 2025. Houlihan Lokey stayed between 62.1% and 64.3%.
- Houlihan Lokey
- Moelis
- Evercore, PJT, Lazard and Perella Weinberg
Houlihan Lokey years end on 31 March of the following year. Lazard includes asset management. Perella Weinberg includes equity-based compensation. Revenue fall, peak to trough: Moelis 44.5%, Evercore 26.3%, Lazard 21.2%, Perella Weinberg 21.2%, Houlihan Lokey 20.3%. PJT rose every year.
Source: Forms 10-K for 2023 and 2025. Houlihan Lokey: years to March 2024 and March 2026.
See the data
| Evercore, whole firm | PJT Partners | Lazard, whole firm | Perella Weinberg | Houlihan Lokey | Moelis | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 56.2% | 64.5% | 59.4% | 74.9% | 62.1% | 59.3% |
| 2022 | 61.5% | 65.2% | 59.7% | 86.4% | 63.4% | 62.7% |
| 2023 | 68.3% | 69.8% | 77.4% | 93.9% | 63.4% | 83.6% |
| 2024 | 66.3% | 69.1% | 65.6% | 89.3% | 63.8% | 69.5% |
| 2025 | 64.9% | 67.6% | 67.3% | 71.3% | 64.3% | 67.1% |
What do real boutique accounts show?
Four UK LLPs file full accounts we could read. All figures are for the year to 31 March 2025.
| Firm | Turnover per head | Staff cost | Other costs | Pool before partner pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UK boutique, over 100 people | about £1.0m | 22.4% | 6.1% | 71.4% |
| UK boutique, about 70 people | about £1.1m | 21.5% | 13.7% | 64.8% |
| UK boutique, about 20 people | about £2.6m | 22.8% | 4.2% | 73.0% |
| UK boutique, 15 people | about £0.4m | 47.7% | 35.7% | 16.5% |
Our calculations from the filed accounts. The pool includes partner pay, so it is not an operating margin.
Revenue swings are sharp: one firm's turnover fell by more than a third in a year and its partner pool by more than two-fifths. Other costs also do not shrink in line with revenue. The smallest firm, the closest to a firm of ten, spent 35.7% of turnover on them. One firm is not a trend, but fixed costs weigh most when revenue is low.
Chart 4
Pay takes about two-thirds of revenue at listed firms; the smallest UK boutique carries the heaviest other costs
Share of revenue, %, our calculation
Stacked bars of revenue split. Listed firms pay 64.3% to 71.7% of revenue, with 12.4% to 22.3% on other costs. Three UK boutiques show 21.5% to 22.8% on staff and 4.2% to 13.7% on other costs. The smallest shows 47.7% and 35.7%.
- Pay or staff cost
- All other costs
- Operating margin, or pool before partner pay
Listed firms: third band is operating margin
UK boutiques: third band is the pool before partner pay
The LLP pool includes partner pay, so it cannot be read across to a listed firm's margin. UK boutiques are years to March 2025. Rows may not sum to 100 because of rounding.
Source: Forms 10-K, a listed European adviser's FY2025 results, Companies House accounts.
See the data
| Pay or staff cost | All other costs | Operating margin, or pool before partner pay | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evercore, Investment Banking & Equities, 2025 | 65.0 | 14.6 | 20.5 |
| Houlihan Lokey, year to March 2026 | 64.3 | 15.6 | 20.1 |
| PJT Partners, 2025 | 67.6 | 12.4 | 20.0 |
| Moelis, 2025 | 67.1 | 14.9 | 18.1 |
| Lazard, whole firm, 2025 | 67.3 | 22.1 | 10.6 |
| A listed European adviser, whole group, 2025 | 71.7 | 19.4 | 8.9 |
| Perella Weinberg, 2025 | 71.3 | 22.3 | 6.4 |
| UK boutique, over 100 people | 22.4 | 6.1 | 71.4 |
| UK boutique, about 70 people | 21.5 | 13.7 | 64.8 |
| UK boutique, about 20 people | 22.8 | 4.2 | 73.0 |
| UK boutique, 15 people | 47.7 | 35.7 | 16.5 |
How real is the succession wave?
Canada shows why intentions need care. CFIB's 2026 survey of 1,731 owners found 63% plan to leave within ten years, with more than C$2 trillion in assets at stake. Statistics Canada found 20.3% of businesses intend to sell or transfer within ten years, 42.6% do not, and 37.1% do not know. Over five years, CFIB's figures sum to 43%, while BDC found 19% very likely to exit. CFIB warns its sample may lean toward owners interested in the topic, and its own series moved from 72% (2018) to 76% (2022) to 63% (2026). BDC's C$300 billion is revenue, not sale value. Not every exit is a mandate either: 54% of CFIB's owners plan a sale to an unrelated buyer and 13% expect to close.
The UK has the best hard evidence. HMRC counts people claiming Business Asset Disposal Relief. Claimants fell from 48,000 in 2021 to 2022 to 42,000 in 2023 to 2024, then reached 61,000 in 2024 to 2025 on £18.5 billion of gains. HMRC says the announced rate rises, from 10% to 14% and then 18%, gave taxpayers a chance to bring disposals forward. That points to tax timing more than demographics. Advisers do report age as the main driver: Dealsuite's survey of 106 UK and Irish firms attributes 41% of transactions to age and no successor, though the average seller's age has fallen from 59 to 56 over a decade. We could not verify an official UK figure for the share of owners near retirement.
Belgium and the EU have thinner data. We found no verified national Belgian figure. A Flemish government study of 586 firms led by people over 55 found 56.6% expect the leader to step down within five years, but only 39.3% expect ownership to pass in that time. Some 47.7% expect an outside sale and 45.6% a family transfer. Vlerick's 2026 monitor of 158 specialists calls retirement by far the main reason for selling. The widely repeated EU figure of 450,000 transfers a year comes from a 2011 study. In June 2026 the Commission issued a new Recommendation, citing almost 8.9 million self-employed people aged 55 or over in 2024.
Chart 5
Taxpayers claiming the UK business sale relief fell for two years, then jumped 45% when a tax rise was announced
Taxpayers claiming the relief, thousands
Columns of taxpayers claiming Business Asset Disposal Relief: 48,000 in 2021 to 2022, 45,000, 42,000, then 61,000 in 2024 to 2025.
The rate rise from 10% to 14% (April 2025) and 18% (April 2026) was announced at Autumn Budget 2024. Figures from 2022 to 2023 onward are provisional. The count includes Investors' Relief.
Source: HMRC Capital Gains Tax statistics, Table 4 and commentary, 27 August 2026.
See the data
| Taxpayers, thousands | |
|---|---|
| 2021 to 2022 | 48 |
| 2022 to 2023 | 45 |
| 2023 to 2024 | 42 |
| 2024 to 2025 | 61 |
Where do mandates come from?
Public data is thin. We found no verified survey of mandate sources for UK, Canadian or Belgian advisers. What exists points one way.
Mandates are won one at a time. Evercore, Moelis and PJT each say an engagement is typically "separately solicited, awarded and negotiated". Yet clients do return. In a study of acquirers from 1979 to 2011, the chance of keeping the same adviser was 49%, which the authors call "a good deal of stickiness". Boutiques win on skill as well as size: about a quarter of merging firms hired one from 1995 to 2006, more often on complex deals and less often as deals grew.
Owners start with people they already trust. Among Canadian owners with a succession plan, 41% used an accountant, 21% a lawyer and 17% a personal financial adviser, while 38% used no one. CFIB's 12 answer options include no M&A adviser category. In Flanders, talks with fellow entrepreneurs and advice from accountants lead. Statistics Canada found 38.4% of intending sellers expect to use professional support such as a broker. Houlihan Lokey describes accounting and professional firms as "potential referral sources".
A Pepperdine survey of 43 bankers, mainly in the US, found 66% of engagements transacted, with a median 32% not closing, and valuation gaps the most cited cause.
What does this mean for an independent firm?
- Check your scale against the survey, not the rule of thumb. A classic Lehman letter sits near half the market between $10 million and $50 million. Use European data if you work in Europe.
- Set fixed costs for the bad year. Listed firms with far more cushion saw pay ratios reach 84%. Know your break-even revenue before a slow year.
- Treat work fees as risk cover. If one engagement in three does not close, success fees alone leave that risk with the firm.
- Put origination time where owners go first. The evidence favours accountants, lawyers and past clients.
- Plan for a steady flow, not a flood. Retirement drives many sales, but stated plans are not sales, and UK tax changes pulled some deals forward.
- Compare like with like. Use listed firms for the shape of the business, and small-firm filings for the numbers.
Limits
- Scale. Listed independents are far larger than a boutique of ten. Lazard and the listed European adviser's whole-firm figures include asset management, and Evercore's segment includes equities.
- The boutique sample is small and chosen by what could be read. Four firms is not a survey. Three are among the larger UK boutiques, and most small firms do not publish a full income statement. Results cover one year, ending March 2025.
- Partner pay hides inside LLP profit. No comparable pay ratio can be drawn. Staff plus members is an upper limit on heads, because some members may also be counted as staff, so turnover per head is a lower limit.
- Accounts were scanned images. We read them from the scans and rechecked the key pages. Two income statements were checked by arithmetic only.
- No currency conversion. Dollar, sterling and euro figures are left in their reporting currency and should not be compared directly.
- Surveys are self-reported. Firmex and Axial are from companies selling to dealmakers, and their samples are not random. Most Firmex respondents are in North America and Europe; we found no fee survey for Belgium alone. Axial's page does not publish its fee table, so we did not use one.
- Internal conflicts in sources. Firmex's text says about a quarter of firms use a minimum success fee, while its chart appears to say 76%, so we left this out. Its text gives last year's $5 million fee as 5.5%, which we could not match to the chart, so we left that out too.
- Stated intentions are not transactions. Survey wording, base and sample differ, so the Canadian figures cannot be reconciled exactly.
- The HMRC relief is an imperfect count. One sale can produce several claimants, claims have a lifetime limit, and not every claim is a company sale. Data stops at April 2025, so we cannot yet see how many later deals were pulled forward.
- What we could not verify. An official UK figure for owners near retirement, a national Belgian figure, and any share of mandates from referrals in our three markets.
- Access limits. VLAIO's site could not be opened, so its study is cited through two published summaries, which differ slightly (56.5% and 56.6%). The Pepperdine report could not be downloaded either. We used an extract and kept only figures confirmed by direct quotation.
- Naming. Four UK LLPs and one listed European adviser are described, not named, and their filings are not linked. We name large listed firms because their figures come from public filings.
- Final check. On 1 November 2026 we reopened the Firmex guide, Moelis's 2023 Form 10-K, and HMRC's Table 4 and commentary. The 4.8%, 1.9%, 83.6%, 45% and 61,000 figures matched.
Sources
Filings of listed firms
- 1Evercore Inc., Form 10-K filed 20 Feb 2026, year 2025. Revenue, pay, costs, segment results, headcount of about 2,570 and 2,100, "separately solicited" wording.
- 2Evercore Inc., Results release, year 2025. 171 Investment Banking Senior Managing Directors at 31 Dec 2025, including committed hires.
- 3Evercore Inc., Form 10-K filed 22 Feb 2024. Revenue and pay, 2021 to 2023.
- 4Moelis & Company, Form 10-K filed 26 Feb 2026, year 2025. Revenue, pay, costs, 1,416 employees, 178 Managing Directors, 363 clients, 254 paying $1 million or more.
- 5Moelis & Company, Form 10-K filed 22 Feb 2024. Revenue and pay, 2021 to 2023.
- 6Houlihan Lokey, Inc., Form 10-K filed 22 May 2026, year to 31 Mar 2026. Revenue, pay, segments, 644 closed transactions, 354 Managing Directors, about 2,800 people, "potential referral sources".
- 7Houlihan Lokey, Inc., Form 10-K filed 21 May 2024. Revenue and pay, years to March 2022 to 2024.
- 8Lazard, Inc., Form 10-K filed 23 Feb 2026, year 2025. Revenue, pay, Financial Advisory net revenue and headcount, 346 clients above $1 million, top ten at 17%.
- 9Lazard, Inc., Form 10-K filed 23 Feb 2024. Revenue and pay, 2021 to 2023.
- 10PJT Partners Inc., Form 10-K filed 26 Feb 2026, year 2025. Revenue, pay, costs, 1,224 people, 133 partners, 436 clients, "separately solicited" wording.
- 11PJT Partners Inc., Form 10-K filed 28 Feb 2024. Revenue and pay, 2021 to 2023.
- 12Perella Weinberg Partners, Form 10-K filed 27 Feb 2026, year 2025. Revenue, pay including equity awards, costs, 736 employees, 187 advisory clients.
- 13Perella Weinberg Partners, Form 10-K filed 23 Feb 2024. Revenue and pay, 2021 to 2023.
- 14A listed European adviser, Results of 17 Feb 2026, year 2025. Group revenue, personnel expenses, operating profit, investment banking revenue and transactions. Preliminary and unaudited at publication. Not linked, see Limits.
Accounts filed at Companies House, year to 31 March 2025
- 15Four UK advisory LLPs, Filed July 2025 to January 2026. Turnover, staff costs, profit, average staff and members. Not linked, see Limits.
Fees and closure rates
- 16Firmex with Axial, DealCircle and Divestopedia, Global M&A Fee Guide 2024-25, survey Dec 2024 to Jan 2025. Success fees by deal size, Europe gap, work fees, crediting, Lehman definitions, respondent profile.
- 17Axial, 23 Jun 2026, survey Q2 2026. 331 responses, 71% charging an upfront fee, rise in success-fee-only work, adviser comment citing 77%.
- 18Pepperdine Graziadio Business School, 2026 Private Capital Markets Report, Spring 2026. 43 bankers, mainly in the US, 66% transacted, median 32% not closed, valuation gap 24%. See limits.
- 19Golubov, Petmezas and Travlos, working paper version of the 2012 Journal of Finance article, Sample 1996 to 2005. Bidder adviser fee, mean 0.637%, median 0.467%, 596 deals.
Mandate origins
- 20Sibilkov and McConnell, Review of Financial Studies, 2014, sample 1979 to 2011. 49% chance of retaining an adviser; the sample comes from the SDC deals database.
- 21Song, Wei and Zhou, Journal of Corporate Finance, 2013, sample 1995 to 2006. Boutique share of about a quarter; choice by size and complexity.
Succession
- 22Canadian Federation of Independent Business, October 2026, survey 21 May to 11 Jun 2026. 63%, exit timing, exit routes, sources of support, bias warning.
- 23Canadian Federation of Independent Business, January 2023, survey June to August 2022. 76% in 2022 and 72% in 2018.
- 24Statistics Canada, 24 Sep 2026, data for Q3 2026. 20.3%, 42.6%, 37.1%, 38.4% expecting professional support.
- 25Business Development Bank of Canada, 2026 study, survey September 2025, n=2,001. 19% very likely to exit within five years, 61% aged 50 or over, C$300 billion in revenues.
- 26Business Development Bank of Canada, 28 Jan 2026. Headline framing and method note.
- 27HM Revenue & Customs, 27 Aug 2026, to tax year 2024 to 2025. Explanation of the rise, rate changes, concentration of gains.
- 28HM Revenue & Customs, 27 Aug 2026. Taxpayers and gains by tax year.
- 29Dealsuite, 26 Feb 2026, data for H2 2025. 41% of transactions, seller age 59 to 56, 106 firms.
- 30Vlerick Business School, 30 Apr 2026. 158 specialists, retirement as the main driver.
- 31Overnamemarkt, summarising VLAIO's Bedrijfsoverdracht in Vlaanderen 2023, Fieldwork autumn 2023 to Q1 2024. 586 firms, expected scenarios, sources of information. Secondary source.
- 32KennisWest, catalogue entry for VLAIO infographics, 2024. 56.6% leadership and 39.3% ownership within five years. Secondary source.
- 33European Commission, C(2026)3799, 22 Jun 2026. Almost 8.9 million self-employed aged 55 or over in EU-27, 2024.
- 34European Commission, 23 Jun 2026. Purpose of the Recommendation.
- 35European Commission, Undated on the page we read. 450,000 firms and 2 million employees a year.
- 36Interreg Europe, September 2020. Dates the 450,000 estimate to a 2011 Commission study.
Published 1 November 2026. Evidence to 1 November 2026.
To cite: Verdalyze, “Pay takes two-thirds of advisory revenue”, 1 November 2026, verdalyze.com/research/advisory-firm-economics