Skip to main content
Backed by McGill Engine and 21st by CentraleSupélec Learn more
Book a call

A line or two by email is enough. What comes back is finished, every figure read against its source, and whatever does not tie waits for your decision.

Book a call
OutlookSent items

Project Oak: check the teaser against the model

From
A partner at your firm
To
Your Verdalyze desk
WordProject Oak_Teaser_v6.docx412 KBExcelProject Oak_Model_v12.xlsx1.8 MB

Check every number in the teaser against the model, please.

Use v12. LTM is to Sep-26. Flag anything that does not tie and leave it as it is. I want to decide those myself.

  1. Read
  2. Tied to source
  3. Checked by a person
OutlookInbox

RE: Project Oak: check the teaser against the model

From
Your Verdalyze desk
To
A partner at your firm
ExcelProject Oak_Tie-out_v6.xlsx96 KBWordProject Oak_Sign-off sheet_v6.docx38 KB

42 figures read, 39 tie to the model. Three need your decision:

  • Adj. EBITDA, FY25A: teaser £3.1m, model £2.9m
  • Capex, FY24A: teaser £1.4m, model £1.2m
  • Trade customers, 120: no source found

Nothing has been changed. Each flag has its cell in the tie-out.

A teaser check on Project Oak, a sample mandate, so every name and figure here is made up. The sheet shows who holds the file at each step.

Step 1With you

A line or two by email, the way you would brief a colleague, with whatever you have attached. There is no form to fill in and nothing new to log into.

OutlookSent items: Verdalyze desk

To your Verdalyze deskNewest first

  • 30-OctProject Oak: check the teaser against the modelWordExcelWith Verdalyze
  • 29-OctOntario food distributors: who could sell in the next two years?Back
  • 28-OctProject Oak: Q&A log, stage 2 questionsExcelBack
  • 27-OctHealthcare services: which buyers came closest, and why did they drop out?SharePointBack
  • 26-OctProject Spruce: IOI comparison for the shortlist callExcelBack
  • 23-OctProject Oak: buyer tracker for Monday's client updateExcelBack

Step 2With Verdalyze

There is no account layer between you and them. They open only the folders you agreed, work from your documents and your templates, and ask you rather than guess.

SharePointProject Oak: manage access

3 of 7 folders open to Verdalyze for this job; the other 4 stay closed

(Your tenant; access agreed in writing before work starts; as at 30-Oct-26)

FolderHoldsVerdalyze
01 Marketing draftsTeaser, CIM draftsCan edit
02 FinancialsModel v12, management accountsRead only
03 TemplatesFirm teaser and CIM templatesRead only
04 LegalNDAs, heads of termsNo access
05 Buyer correspondenceBidder mail, process lettersNo access
06 PeopleKey employee termsNo access
07 Other mandatesAll other live and past dealsNo access

Note: You grant access and you can revoke it at any time. Source: site permissions, Project Oak.

Step 3With Verdalyze

The teaser goes line by line against the model, and the set is read together so a number says the same thing everywhere. What does not tie is flagged and left as it is.

ExcelProject Oak_Tie-out_v6.xlsx

D7fx='[Project Oak_Model_v12.xlsx]P&L'!$F$31

ABCDEFG
1Project Oak: 139 of 142 figures tie to source; 3 flagged in the teaser before it goes out
2(£ in millions unless stated; FYE December; LTM to Sep-26; as at 30-Oct-26)
3RefFigureStatedPer sourceDiff.StatusAgreed to
4WordTeaser, Project Oak_Teaser_v6.docx42 read, 39 tied, 3 flagged
5T1Revenue, FY25A18.418.40.0TiedModel, P&L!F12
6T2Gross margin, FY25A34.0%34.0%0.0%TiedModel, P&L!F19
7T3Adj. EBITDA, FY25A3.12.90.2FlaggedModel, P&L!F31
8T4Capex, FY24A(1.4)(1.2)(0.2)FlaggedModel, DCF!B13
9T5Trade customers (number)120NANAFlaggedNo source found
10ExcelComps and precedents, Project Oak_Model_v12.xlsx72 read, 72 tied
11C1Precedents, 25th percentile8.7x8.7x0.0xTiedPrecedents!K20
12C2Implied EV at the 25th percentile26.926.90.0Tied8.7x on £3.1m
13PowerPointBoard materials, Project Oak_Board materials_v5.pptx28 read, 28 tied
14S1Final round parties (number)440TiedBuyer tracker, A5
15S2Final round median EV29.529.50.0TiedBuyer tracker, I6:I9
16S3EV / LTM EBITDA at the median9.5x9.5x0.0xTied29.5 over 3.1
17Total: 142 read, 139 tied3 flagged
18Source: Project Oak_Model_v12.xlsx, Buyer tracker, market data. T3 moves FY25A margin from 16.8% to 15.8%. NA: no source.

Tie-outTeaserCompsBoard deck

Verdalyze: 3.1 stated, 2.9 in the model

Step 4With you

Your template, your format, with the checks shown where you will read them. Each flag sits on its line with the cell it came from, so you review the exceptions rather than the whole document.

WordProject Oak_Teaser_v6.docx

Project Oak | Confidential investment summary, October 2026Preliminary draft | Strictly private and confidential

Profitable, founder-owned specialist food distributor

UK; chilled and ambient; own label; two sites; 120 trade customers

The opportunity

The Company supplies chilled and ambient food to independent retailers and caterers across the UK under its own and third-party labels. Revenue has grown every year since FY22A, at a 10.6% CAGR, and a second site opened in FY24A has added capacity for own-label lines. The shareholder is exploring a sale and will support a transition.

Investment highlights

  • 22 years of continuous trading; no customer above 12% of revenue
  • Top five customers at 41% of revenue, on multi-year terms
  • Own label at 18.0% of FY25A revenue, up from 9.0% in FY22A
  • Second site gives headroom; management willing to remain

Key metrics

£18.4mFY25A revenue

£3.1mFY25A Adj. EBITDA

34.0%Gross margin

120Trade customers

10.6%Revenue CAGR, 3 years

18.0%Own label, FY25A

£ in millionsRevenueAdj. EBITDA

13.62.2FY22A
14.92.4FY23A
16.62.8FY24A
18.43.1FY25A
20.13.2FY26E

Financial summary (£ in millions, FYE December)

FY22AFY23AFY24AFY25ALTM Sep-26FY26E
Revenue13.614.916.618.419.720.1
growthNA9.6%11.4%10.8%NA9.2%
Gross margin32.1%32.8%33.4%34.0%NA34.2%
Adj. EBITDA2.22.42.83.13.13.2
margin16.2%16.1%16.9%16.8%15.7%15.9%
Capex(0.4)(0.5)(1.4)(0.6)NA(0.6)

A limited number of further parties are being approached. NDA required before the information memorandum is released. Indicative offers by 13-Nov-26. All enquiries through the adviser only; do not contact the Company, its staff, customers or suppliers.

Checked by Verdalyze

Model says £2.9m, cell F31. Fix before this goes out.

Step 5With you

Flagged figures wait for a partner, each with what we found. Nothing is changed for you, and nothing leaves your firm until a person there approves it, unless you decide otherwise.

WordProject Oak_Sign-off sheet_v6.docx

Project OakStrictly private and confidential

3 of 42 figures held for your decision before the teaser goes out

(£ in millions unless stated; FYE December; as at 30-Oct-26)

Held for a partner

  • T3Adj. EBITDA, FY25A3.1 is the LTM figure. FY25A in the model is 2.9Teaser3.1Source2.9Use 2.9Keep 3.1
  • T4Capex, FY24AModel, DCF!B13Teaser(1.4)Source(1.2)Use (1.2)Keep (1.4)
  • T5Trade customers (number)No source foundTeaser120SourceNASource itRemove
Approved by (partner)
Date
Release to

Source: Project Oak_Tie-out_v6.xlsx, tab Tie-out. Nothing is changed or released until this page is signed.

Step 6With both of us

Every week or two we sit down with your team: what came back, what was flagged, what changes next. As your deals change, the work changes with them.

PowerPointWeekly review_Week 44.pptx

Week 44: 9 pieces of work delivered, 291 of 296 figures tied, 5 flagged for your decision

Preliminary draft, subject to review
Weekly review, w/e 30-Oct-26

Delivered (number)

Target lists2
Comps1
Teaser checks3
Status decks3

ExcelFigures checked(1)

MandateReadTiedFlagged% tied
Project Oak142139397.9%
Project Spruce9694297.9%
Project Sycamore58580100.0%
Total296291598.3%

HubSpotOwner replies

Notes sent
24
Replies
7
Reply rate
29.2%
Calls booked
2

For your decision

  • Project Oak: Adj. EBITDA in the teaser does not tie to the model, held for your sign-off
  • Project Spruce: two customer figures wait on the latest management accounts
  • Next week: buyer tracker refresh and the Q&A log for stage 2

Source: Delivery log, firm CRM, Project Oak_Model_v12.xlsx. Reviewed with your team, every Tuesday.

(1) Flagged figures are held for your decision. Project Oak's 142 agrees to the tie-out schedule.

Strictly private and confidential | 3

  1. 1What came back
  2. 2What was flagged
  3. 3What changes
  4. 4What comes next

Checks follow the job. On a teaser, these are the ones that run, and you see the result of each.

On the sample teaser: 42 figures read, 39 tied, 3 held for a partner

39 tied3 flagged

CheckWhat it meansOn this teaser
Read against the sourceEach figure is read against the model, filing or document it came from.42 read
Agreed across the setA figure has to say the same thing in the teaser, the comps and the status deck.142 read across 3 files
TracedEvery figure carries its source, one click away.39 tied to a cell
Flagged, never guessedWhat does not agree, or has no source, goes to a person. It is not quietly fixed.2 differ, 1 no source
Read againAnything unsure is read a second time before it reaches you.3 read again
Closed by a personNothing is marked settled on its own. A person closes every item.3 held for a partner

Source: Project Oak_Tie-out_v6.xlsx. Sample data: the names and figures are made up.

Your environment stays yours. We agree where everything sits before we start, and you decide what goes where.

Stays with you

Your documents, data room, CRM and firm memory. You grant access, it is limited to what the work needs, and you can revoke it at any time.

  • SharePointDeal documents and firm memory
  • OutlookMail and briefs
  • HubSpotCRM and contact history
  • ExcelModels and trackers

Goes to AI, only as agreed

For larger firms, the work can run inside the firm's own environment. Otherwise, the text a task needs is sent only to AI providers that do not train on customer data under their commercial terms, and the result comes back. Before anything reaches a model, a redaction and pseudonymisation step can mask names, figures and other identifying details, then restore them in the finished work.

Sent
14 pages, one task
Returned
The result
Training
Excluded

What we keep

Operational records: when something ran and whether it worked. They hold no document content.

14:02Tie-outCompleted
14:06Second readCompleted
14:11TallyCompleted

Tools shown are examples. We work under your firm's own licences.How we protect deal data

A short path. Each step ends with a clear outcome, and whether to take the next one is your decision.

  1. Call

    One job, named.

    You tell us how your firm runs deals. We tell you which job we would take first, and where we would not help.

  2. Proposal

    What comes first, and why.

    We set out the job and our reasons. If you need an NDA before sharing anything, we sign one.

  3. Engagement letter

    Two papers, signed.

    Scope and fees go in your engagement letter, and data handling in a data agreement, both before work starts.

  4. Set up on your deals

    Set up around you.

    We set up around your documents, your CRM and your process, with access agreed in writing.

  5. Check

    First work signed off.

    It comes back with its checks shown, and a person signs off. We take on more only as the work earns your trust.

  6. Run

    A review every week or two.

    We do the work and go through it with you, so it keeps pace as your deals change.

It depends on length. Straightforward jobs come back within 12 hours, most work within 48 hours, and a long piece such as a 120-page CIM in about five working days. When we take a brief, we tell you when it will be back.

  • 12 hoursStraightforward work, such as a founder call brief or a teaser checked against the model.Short
  • 48 hoursMost work, such as comps and precedents, a buyer universe or a no-name teaser.Typical
  • 5 daysLong pieces, such as a 120-page CIM built in your template. Working days.Long

Your team keeps working as normal while we do it.

  • One partner who owns the work

    So every question has one place to go, and every flag one person to decide it.

  • Access to what the job requires

    Agreed in writing before we start, and yours to revoke.

  • Honest feedback on the first outputs

    It is how the work comes to read like your firm's.

We look at all three for every question.

Build

If the work needs something made around your firm, we build it and run it. We will say so when it does not.

License

If licensing is better, we set up and run what you license.

Leave alone

If doing nothing is better, we will tell you that too.

How quickly does work come back?

Straightforward jobs come back within 12 hours, most work within 48 hours, and a long piece such as a 120-page CIM in about five working days. Before Verdalyze did deal work, we built AI systems and tailored software for M&A and corporate finance firms. Those full builds, such as a target finder for a search fund in the UK, took 10 to 12 days from first build to a working system, and that engineering is what lets deal work come back this quickly now.

Do we have to change how the team works?

No. We design around your existing process. If your firm keeps a particular folder structure or tracks deals a certain way, we work from that.

Who will we deal with?

The people doing your work. There is no account layer between you and them.

What does a partner actually review?

The exceptions. Each flag comes with the figure, its source and what we found, so you decide those rather than read the whole document again.

How do fees work?

They depend on your firm's size and the number of mandates you run, and they are set in your engagement letter. We go through them on a call.

What happens if we stop?

Your data and outputs are yours. We hand over what we hold in standard formats, delete it within 90 days and revoke our access.

Book a call